NewEnglandJeepz.org
February 07, 2012, 03:02:28 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Custom Search
News:
 
  Home Help Search Gallery Login Register  


Ballistic Fabrication
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: crawl ratio  (Read 872 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
navman 5.0
Official NEJ Member
Trade Count: (1)
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 811



« on: July 19, 2010, 09:53:05 PM »

Well after this sundays damage, it's time to build the new front axle. I can't decide on what to do for gearing. Right now I have 37" tires, a 2.72 low range, a 6.68 first gear and 4.10 ring and pinion. This gives me a 74.5:1 crawl ratio. Second gear is 3.34 giving me a 37.25:1 crawl ratio and is about a thousand rpm less than first at the same speed. I want a bit more for crawling, but don't want to go overboard especially with the big swing between gears. What do you guys think?
Logged

95 YJ, Mustang 5.0, Rock Krawler coilover, BDS sua rear, 39" BFG stickeys, 309 axle, Bling Bling Spyderlocks
Ian
Club Officer
Trade Count: (2)
*****
Online Online

Posts: 6865


slow ride, take it easy


WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2010, 09:55:30 PM »

when i was looking into crawl ratio's it seemed that 90-100 was a good new england ratio, especially for non buggies.
Logged

i am an AMSOIL dealer! pm me for a quote

60 w/ minor bling 4.56, 14b ff rear w/detriot 4.56, atlas 2speed 5.0 4 custom link rear and 3link front, 110" wheelbase, pcs full hydro, fox 2.5's,  and 42" Irok stikies... and no clue

'00 tj (see above)
'95 Cherokee
'82 Cherokee
'83 wagoneer (rusted out parts vehicle
navman 5.0
Official NEJ Member
Trade Count: (1)
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 811



« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2010, 10:01:45 PM »

4.88 gears would put me at an 88.67
Logged

95 YJ, Mustang 5.0, Rock Krawler coilover, BDS sua rear, 39" BFG stickeys, 309 axle, Bling Bling Spyderlocks
jps4jeep
Club Officer
Trade Count: (1)
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10244


I'm the Fung Wah Bus of offroading


« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2010, 10:23:04 PM »

go 4.88, will be nice with the slightly deeper ratio, but you will still have 2nd for wheel speed
Logged

To error is to be human; to error and blame it on someone else, that managerial potential.
Ian
Club Officer
Trade Count: (2)
*****
Online Online

Posts: 6865


slow ride, take it easy


WWW
« Reply #4 on: July 19, 2010, 10:31:54 PM »

what is the new front axle going to be?
Logged

i am an AMSOIL dealer! pm me for a quote

60 w/ minor bling 4.56, 14b ff rear w/detriot 4.56, atlas 2speed 5.0 4 custom link rear and 3link front, 110" wheelbase, pcs full hydro, fox 2.5's,  and 42" Irok stikies... and no clue

'00 tj (see above)
'95 Cherokee
'82 Cherokee
'83 wagoneer (rusted out parts vehicle
navman 5.0
Official NEJ Member
Trade Count: (1)
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 811



« Reply #5 on: July 19, 2010, 10:37:46 PM »

Well you know I won't be happy till everything on this rig is Ford  Grin
Spider 9 with a truehi9 chuck. Thats why I need to decide on gears right now so I can get the center ordered up.
Logged

95 YJ, Mustang 5.0, Rock Krawler coilover, BDS sua rear, 39" BFG stickeys, 309 axle, Bling Bling Spyderlocks
Ian
Club Officer
Trade Count: (2)
*****
Online Online

Posts: 6865


slow ride, take it easy


WWW
« Reply #6 on: July 19, 2010, 10:41:15 PM »

Well you know I won't be happy till everything on this rig is Ford  Grin
Spider 9 with a truehi9 chuck. Thats why I need to decide on gears right now so I can get the center ordered up.

spiffy.  what will be your weak link now?  t-case? 
Logged

i am an AMSOIL dealer! pm me for a quote

60 w/ minor bling 4.56, 14b ff rear w/detriot 4.56, atlas 2speed 5.0 4 custom link rear and 3link front, 110" wheelbase, pcs full hydro, fox 2.5's,  and 42" Irok stikies... and no clue

'00 tj (see above)
'95 Cherokee
'82 Cherokee
'83 wagoneer (rusted out parts vehicle
jason m
Trade Count: (0)
Guest

Offline Offline

Posts: 1574



« Reply #7 on: July 19, 2010, 11:16:46 PM »

Well coming from driving a Auto for years I kinda forgot what gear on gear crawl ratio is like. I'm used to a T/C ( tourqe convetor ) doing the crawl for me. But I lack deeper gears ( for now ) and really push the engine sometimes to make a decent crawl happen. I'm to the point were I use the brakes to help keep my crawl ratio down so I can keep wheel spin from happing.
This was Miguels small probalem at Adams house over the weekend, he used more throttle than his crawl ratio. Me I'm only 36-1 but the T/C nearly double's that. But the more I use that T/C the more heat I build.

For stick, I allway feel lower the better. You can allways up shift. Really I'm not the guy to speak much on the topic as like I said I deal with a slush box.
I know that the buggy I borrowed Roll Eyes over the weekend it had a 5.0 atlas, a TF904 witch is a 2.76 first gear and 4.10's in the axle. It crawled so well, very little brake action was needed for me to work it threw some hard spots, even one spot were I was completely on my side with Miguel allmost fallen out of his seat. But comparied to my Jeep it was unreal how a lower crawl Auto was worlds better.

So what would 5.13's give you. Do you plan to keep the stick or will you ever upgrade to a C6. If you did then the deeper gears now will benifit later if you did swap to a slush box.

Jason.
Logged

whats left of a 93YJ, 4.0/700r/241/HP60/coiled14bolt and beating it like it owes me money.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfTVptGdGg
navman 5.0
Official NEJ Member
Trade Count: (1)
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 811



« Reply #8 on: July 19, 2010, 11:43:41 PM »

5.13 would put me at a 93.21, and add another 100 or so rpm, so not a whole lot different. I don't think I would ever go auto, I know there are advantages, but I like the challenge of the stick.
Logged

95 YJ, Mustang 5.0, Rock Krawler coilover, BDS sua rear, 39" BFG stickeys, 309 axle, Bling Bling Spyderlocks
jeepgod
Trade Count: (0)
Guest

Offline Offline

Posts: 2905

nothing to see here


« Reply #9 on: July 20, 2010, 06:48:29 AM »

swap in 5.13 gears, you will never regret it. the amount of control off road will be amazing for you. i speak from experience. i went from about 38 to 1 to 89 to 1 and then to 147 to 1 and have never thought "boy wish i had a worse crawl ratio"
Logged

DISCLAIMER: 90% of the time the things i write on this forum are meant as a joke! Please be advised that these jokes are not meant to upset or hurt any one individual. if i offend you i am sorry. the other 10% of the time i am serious. if you are unsure pm me and i will be glad to explain.  thxs
mika401
Official NEJ Member
Trade Count: (0)
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2499



« Reply #10 on: July 20, 2010, 11:57:31 AM »

Todd's right after wheeling Adam's property this past Sat my 4.10 gears just dont cut it!  2.45x4.3x4.10 = 43/1 not enough.

Yesterday I ordered up some 5.13 gears from ECGS, $400 total shipped to my door for the front & rear which will give me 2.45x4.3x5.13 = 54/1 much better!

Go low you wont regret it in the highly technical areas
Logged
navman 5.0
Official NEJ Member
Trade Count: (1)
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 811



« Reply #11 on: July 28, 2010, 05:46:01 PM »

So yesterday I ordered up the hi9 with 5.14 gears. This will put me at a 93.21 first gear crawl ratio, gaining almost 200 rpm at the very bottom over my current setup. 2nd gear will give me a 46.61 CR which is still numerically higher than what I had with 1st gear on the original 4cyl/35" setup so that should still work on the easy stuff. Thanks for the input guys. Now I need to find a strong set of gears for the rear.
Logged

95 YJ, Mustang 5.0, Rock Krawler coilover, BDS sua rear, 39" BFG stickeys, 309 axle, Bling Bling Spyderlocks
jason m
Trade Count: (0)
Guest

Offline Offline

Posts: 1574



« Reply #12 on: July 28, 2010, 08:14:18 PM »

Todd's right after wheeling Adam's property this past Sat my 4.10 gears just dont cut it!  2.45x4.3x4.10 = 43/1 not enough.

Yesterday I ordered up some 5.13 gears from ECGS, $400 total shipped to my door for the front & rear which will give me 2.45x4.3x5.13 = 54/1 much better!

Go low you wont regret it in the highly technical areas

Add the right amount of fluid in one's tranny also for the technical areas to Grin

Jason.
« Last Edit: July 28, 2010, 08:14:38 PM by jason m » Logged

whats left of a 93YJ, 4.0/700r/241/HP60/coiled14bolt and beating it like it owes me money.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pfTVptGdGg
Twisty
Club Officer
Trade Count: (0)
*****
Online Online

Posts: 9493


iFab, and you can too!


« Reply #13 on: July 29, 2010, 12:07:25 AM »

I'm at 40:1 if you do NOT count for torque converter slip.  Probably around 60:1 or 70:1 if you DO account for slip. 

With the 42s, I wish it was deeper.  I'm really looking forward to getting my doubler (4:1 low-low) in.

My trans is 2.8:1, my transfer case is 2.72:1, and my axles are 5.38:1.
Logged

Under Construction - 88 MJ buggy, 4.0/AW4, 203/205, 3 link front/4 link rear on airshocks, 42" Iroks, full hydro
jps4jeep
Club Officer
Trade Count: (1)
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10244


I'm the Fung Wah Bus of offroading


« Reply #14 on: July 29, 2010, 08:00:16 AM »

after build I'll be 112.1 assuming I run 42" tires.
right now I am 51.1 but witht the doubler I'll have options in between
Logged

To error is to be human; to error and blame it on someone else, that managerial potential.


Replacement Parts for Jeep Vehicles & More...
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  



Ruff Stuff Specialties
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | TinyPortal v0.9.8 © Bloc
SMF Theme © Gaia
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!